search document
search Law Commission site
Go to home page - Law Commission.
  • Home
  • About the Commission
    • What We Do
    • Staff
    • Commissioners
    • Vacancies
    • Corporate Information
  • Our Work
  • Publications
  • News
  • Media & Speeches
Login or Sign Up to have your say


Go to project page
  • The news media meets ‘new media’: rights, responsibilities and regulation in the digital age
  • General information
    • About the Law Commission
    • Foreword
    • Acknowledgments
  • Call for submissions
  • Summary and preliminary proposals
    • Our Terms of Reference
    • Part 1: Who are the “news media” and how should they be regulated?
    • Part 2: Speech harms: the adequacy of the current legal sanctions and remedies
  • Questions
  • Chapter 1 - The context of our review
    • The world wide web
    • Web 2.0 and the News Media
  • PART 1: Who are the “news media” and how should they be regulated?
  • Chapter 2 - Online media in New Zealand
    • Introduction
    • The 'news' publishing spectrum
    • Moderation & control online
    • Conclusion
  • Chapter 3 - The news media's special legal status
    • Introduction
  • Chapter 4 - What distinguishes the news media and why it matters
    • Introduction
    • The evolution and the role of the news media
    • Discussion
    • Preliminary Conclusions
    • Where to draw the line?
    • Applying the tests in the New Zealand context
    • Preliminary Conclusions
  • Chapter 5 - Regulating news media: strengths and weaknesses of the current approaches
    • Introduction
    • The problem
    • Strengths and weaknesses of the two models
    • Convergence: the elephant in the room
  • Chapter 6 - Regulation of the media – a new regulator
    • Introduction
    • Regulatory models
    • A new regulator?
    • The requirements of effective media regulation
    • The issue of jurisdiction
    • Should there be a statute?
    • Entertainment
  • PART 2: Speech harms: the adequacy of the current legal sanctions and remedies
  • Chapter 7 - Free speech abuses: quantifying the harms and assessing the remedies
    • Introduction
    • The harms
    • Legal redress
    • Limitations of the law
    • Non-legal remedies
    • Conclusion
  • Chapter 8 - Free speech abuses: options for reform
    • Introduction
    • Reforming the law
    • A lower level Tribunal?
    • A Commissioner

Download Publications:

  • LC-IP27-ALL.pdf (PDF, 2 MB)
  • LC-IP27-Summary.pdf (PDF, 1 MB)
  • LC-IP27.epub (EPUB, 612 KB)
<< BACKNEXT >>

Chapter 7 - Free speech abuses: quantifying the harms and assessing the remedies

Conclusion

Our preliminary research and consultation indicate that significant harms are being experienced by some as a result of the abusive and sometimes malicious use of the internet as a publishing platform. Young people are particularly vulnerable given the all-pervasive nature of social networking in their lives. However the problems are not confined to the young. As we have seen, malicious impersonation and various forms of cyber harassment can have an immensely debilitating effect on people’s well-being and may even impact on their professional and business lives.

Existing criminal and civil law is clearly capable of dealing with many of the types of harmful communication which we have canvassed in this chapter.

However, the current law is not always capable of addressing some of the new and potentially more damaging ways of using communication to harm others. The obstacles include the difficulties the public can experience accessing the law; the adequacy of investigative resources and tools; problems in the way in which offences are defined; and possible gaps in the types of offences currently included in the statute book. In addition those websites which publish user-generated content need specific knowledge of transgressions in order to be able to respond effectively to legitimate complaints.

As well as legal remedies, many social media sites rely on a combination of internal controls, including “terms and conditions”, backed by community monitoring and reporting systems to deal with speech abuses on their sites.

However there is a lack of empirical information about the effectiveness of these self-regulatory systems and given the vast amount of data published on these sites every day there are clearly limits to the amount of monitoring that can take place.

In the following chapter we put forward some preliminary ideas for ways in which it may be possible to address some of the problems confronting those seeking remedies for speech abuses arising on the internet.



<< BACKNEXT >>
 

Footer graphic
  • Copyright
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • Useful Links
  • Contact Us